Stockroom Inc. v. Dydacomp Development Corp.

New Jersey Law Journal


Plaintiff's claims of breach of contract and breach of warranty arising from installation of the allegedly defective software are time-barred as plaintiff failed to allege sufficient facts of fraudulent concealment for equitable tolling to apply; it has alleged a plausible claim for omission under the Consumer Fraud Act.

This premium content is reserved for New Jersey Law Journal subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202598501818

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.