Judge Who Forced Litigant to Trial Without a Lawyer Is Reversed

, New Jersey Law Journal


A family court judge bent on disposing of one of his oldest cases wrongly rushed a litigant who had just fired his lawyer to try his case pro se, rather than giving him to time to hire a new one.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Marc J. Rogoff, Esq.

    I had a similar case like this where the client was substantially disadvantaged in an oral settlement with a lawyer that filed a motion to be relieved on the day of trial but was not let out of the case. The client ended up with substantial financial obligations beyond his means with no funds to file an appeal. A motion was filed to vacate the judgment on grounds similar to this case that was denied. I hope this case reminds judges' to be more sensitive to the litigant's rights over the court's calendar. Many times litigant's can not afford to correct egregious results.

  • The Judge

    What an asshole.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202594925684

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.