U.S. SUPREME COURT

Marshall v. Rodgers

CRIMINAL LAW — Right To Counsel — Waiver

New Jersey Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

The conclusion of the California courts that there was no Sixth Amendment violation in the denial of an unrepresented defendant's motion for a new trial, based on lack of support, was not contrary to "clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States."

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202594665053

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.