U.S. SUPREME COURTNew Jersey Law Journal
Armour v. City of Indianapolis
CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Equal Protection
Indianapolis had a rational basis for refusing to issue refunds to homeowers who had paid a sewer assessment under a plan that was later abandoned in favor of a bonding system and thus did not violate the Equal Protection Clause.
This premium content is reserved for New Jersey Law Journal subscribers.
Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.
Already a subscriber? Log in now