U.S. SUPREME COURT

Armour v. City of Indianapolis

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW — Equal Protection

New Jersey Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

Indianapolis had a rational basis for refusing to issue refunds to homeowers who had paid a sewer assessment under a plan that was later abandoned in favor of a bonding system and thus did not violate the Equal Protection Clause.

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202558140020

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.