Christie Chief Counsel Goes to Private Practice; Joined by 6 from McElroy

, New Jersey Law Journal


Thomas Scrivo, chief counsel to Gov. Chris Christie, is leaving the administration to open up a new law firm.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • bright_qng@yahoo.com

    II. Statement Case for Discussion He, plaintiff appeals, would proudly like to discuss for Hearing case of the Ninth Circuit , in which does not only persuade statutory of the government of the United States of America enforcement of 42 U.S.C chapter II Civil Rights but also perform actually all laws of the Vietnam War of the United States Congress that enacted statutory. Let him receive Imprisoned Benefits Insurance of the Vietnam War when plaintiff appeals was enforced statutory of Foreign Assistance of the government of the United States of America enacted. when he, plaintiff appeals, would solemnly like to persuade some of questions the court: Why did The United States Congress enact for the statutory? What has the government of the United States of America performed the statutory? And who should be protecting for the super values of the United States Justice, freedom, and democracy of the United States of American? when has the Country of San Mateo Court trained plaintiff — appeals who should be protected for the United States Constitution and statutory without put into practices of crimes and treason the United States of America and the American people. Therefore, Plaintiff — appeals would like to Hearing in the United States Court for Appeal? For his opinion that if Plaintiff — appeals did not only destroy the United States Constitution and statutory but also betray an oath loyalty with the United States of America to what would United States Court of Appeals punish him when Plaintiff — appeals did not have be treason and also no had betraying the oath loyal since Plaintiff — appeals has raised his hand taken an oath before America flag? He, plaintiff appeals, would like to provide to his civil rights case when the United States has been enacting for the statutory: First Amendment and Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of because of these are to be statutory.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202780421800

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.