Judge Admits Conflict Hiring Lawyer But Denies Knowledge of a Cover Up

, New Jersey Law Journal

   | 5 Comments

A family court judge charged with ethics infractions admits she sought advice on her own child-support problem from a lawyer who had cases filed in her court, but she denies any complicity in covering up the conflict of interest.

This article has been archived, and is no longer available on this website.

View this content exclusively through LexisNexis® Here

Not a LexisNexis® Subscriber?

Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via lexis.com® and Nexis®. This includes content from The National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • Ruby2008

    Isolated case? I think not.

  • Ruby2008

    How can an inexperienced judge make expert judicial decisions that affect families and lives forever? How can a family law attorney be so corrupt? Are you done snickering? The actions of Mr. Louis should not be tolerated. His opposition to reforming alimony should not be taken seriously for his intentions are obviously self-serving as is his opposition to guidelines that could limit litigation and the fees that line his pocket.

  • Ruby2008

    Isolated case? I think not.

  • not available

    The judiciary is well aware that Family Court is the training court for newly appointed Judges. As such they are on the Job trainees, upon their swearing in, they are given unfathomable power and authority to make decisions without prior review or approval of their superiors. The potential for errors and actual errors made by the trainees could and often wreck the lives of NJ families. In this case the Family Court Judge wish to site inexperience on the job as cause for her actions. I say if she is too inexperienced to make valid decisions on her own case, she is too inexperienced to make decisions on the lives of NJ citizens. She must be removed no second chance to destroy our citizens.

  • Tom Leustek

    Frank Louis is a vocal opponent of alimony reform and of the concept of statutory guidelines to help judges make fair alimony determinations. I wonder if there is a connection between his opposition to guidelines and his alleged attempt to curry favor with Judge Appleby?

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article# 1202630430280

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.