N.J. SUPREME COURT

State v. Buckley

CRIMINAL LAW

New Jersey Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

Defendant's proffered evidence regarding the decedent's failure to use a seat belt and the location of the utility pole the car struck is inadmissible on "but for" causation under N.J.S.A. 2C:2-3(a)(1) and on defendant's awareness of the risk under 2C:2-3(c).

This premium content is reserved for New Jersey Law Journal subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202600407601

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.