Complex Litigation and E-Discovery

Vigilance Is a Virtue

The importance of disclosing juror misconduct in complex actions

, New Jersey Law Journal


Attorneys who discover that a juror has concealed personal information during voir dire that is relevant to the case must act promptly to inform the court or otherwise risk waiving the right to a new trial on the basis of juror misconduct. The recent case of Apple v. Samsung, where billions of dollars were at stake, shows just how important it is to review prospective jurors' backgrounds and watch empanelled jurors' behavior.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to Lexis Advance®.

Continue to Lexis Advance®

Not a Lexis Advance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via Lexis Advance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202593918046

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.