New Jersey Erects Ethical Bar to Common-Law Liens on Client Files

, New Jersey Law Journal

   | 3 Comments

As of April 1, lawyers no longer will be able to hold onto client files and papers to collect fees.

This content has been archived. It is available exclusively through our partner LexisNexis®.

To view this content, please continue to LexisAdvance®.

Continue to LexisAdvance®

Not a LexisAdvance® Subscriber? Subscribe Now

Why am I seeing this?

LexisNexis® is now the exclusive third party online distributor of the broad collection of current and archived versions of ALM's legal news publications. LexisNexis® customers will be able to access and use ALM's content by subscribing to the LexisNexis® services via LexisAdvance®. This includes content from the National Law Journal®, The American Lawyer®, Law Technology News®, The New York Law Journal® and Corporate Counsel®, as well as ALM's other newspapers, directories, legal treatises, published and unpublished court opinions, and other sources of legal information.

ALM's content plays a significant role in your work and research, and now through this alliance LexisNexis® will bring you access to an even more comprehensive collection of legal content.

For questions call 1-877-256-2472 or contact us at customercare@alm.com

What's being said

  • jamesacap

    The statutory charging lien is a valuable tool in the right type of case.

  • Rick

    I hope the RPC commentary specifically notes that an attorney's charging lien rights are not affected by the abolition of the retaining lien. That could be a source of confusion.

  • Lewis B. Coe

    In the "olden days" lawyers would get a second mortgage on a client's home. That's history. Now the common law retaining lien is history. I suppose the next step is that lawyers will be history. Should have been a plumber after all. They always get paid.



    More seriously, I wonder if the courts will become more liberal in allowing a lawyer to withdraw as counsel as a result of a client's failure to pay? Attorney Rubin quoted in the article probably says it best. Increase the size of your initial retainer fee. I add, better to have fewer clients who pay than to be working for clients who won't.



    The preceeding is NOT to be contrued as a negative thought about handling a meritorious pro-bono case or cutting a fee for a worthy person who truly wants, respects, and appreciates you but honestly just can not afford your standard fee.

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202593669534

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.