N.J. SUPERIOR COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION D.N. v. K.M. FAMILY LAW New Jersey Law Journal January 24, 2013 | 1 Comments share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. reprints Indigents mounting a defense or presenting allegations of domestic violence are not entitled to appointed counsel. This premium content is reserved for New Jersey Law Journal subscribers. Continue reading by getting started with a subscription. Subscribe Now for Unlimited Access Already a subscriber? Log in now VIEW COMMENTS ( 1 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions not available Mar 15, 2014 I‘m confused. If loss of driving privileges is a "consequence of magnitude", wouldn‘t loss of firearm privileges be the same? Pursuant to the Lautenberg Amendment, if an indigent defendant was accused of committing assault and harassment as D.N was in this case, he or she would not be eligible to seek or maintain employment in the military, law enforcement or security fields. And regardless of how anybody feels about the subject, it is a constitutional right. Also, how is an injustice okay if it costs the defendant $749, but an injustice that costs $750 is not ok? It‘s still an injustice, no? Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202585643417 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.