Judicial Survey 2012 — Vicinage 10 — Morris-Sussex

   | 0 Comments

 

Each judge's rank in the vicinage (shown in parentheses) is based on his or her overall score, which is an average of the judge’s scores in all nine evaluative categories. Under each score is the quantity of survey responses received in that category.
Judge (Rank)
*= assignment or presiding judge
1.
Fairly weighs evidence and arguments
2.
Properly applies procedure and evidence rules
3.
Knowledgeable on substantive law
4.
Capable of handling complex cases
5.
Familiar with pleadings, briefs and record
6.
Skillfully fosters settlement when appropriate
7.
Moves proceedings and makes decisions promptly
8.
Courteous and respectful to litigants and lawyers
9.
Unbiased as to race, gender and party identity
10.
Overall Score
Brennan, Robert (11)
8.05
8.07
8.12
8.06
8.47
7.24
8.02
8.47
9.04
8.17
 
131
130
129
124
128
108
127
129
123
 
Conforti, N. Peter (4)
8.30
8.50
8.50
8.53
8.68
8.13
8.79
8.89
9.22
8.62
 
57
56
56
55
57
55
57
56
55
 
Critchley, Thomas (7)
8.21
8.11
8.27
8.05
8.25
8.16
8.30
9.00
9.23
8.40
 
107
108
105
102
104
103
105
105
103
 
DeMarzo, James (14)
8.07
7.86
7.70
7.50
8.24
7.87
7.59
8.92
9.08
8.09
 
91
90
89
86
91
89
88
89
89
 
Enright, Catherine (6)
8.25
8.23
8.80
8.42
8.69
8.40
8.45
8.40
8.73
8.48
 
91
93
93
91
94
89
96
95
91
 
Farber, James (10)
7.93
8.06
8.44
8.28
8.59
7.51
8.03
8.38
8.88
8.23
 
83
82
80
78
79
73
77
78
74
 
Gannon, Edward (22)
6.63
6.48
6.56
6.39
6.44
6.51
6.76
7.06
7.93
6.75
 
125
125
124
123
126
127
128
129
125
 
Gilson, Robert (15)
7.80
7.82
7.98
7.72
8.31
7.31
7.31
8.71
9.31
8.03
 
49
49
50
47
49
45
49
49
49
 
Hansbury, Stephan (18)
7.68
7.62
7.63
7.59
8.09
7.16
7.80
8.32
8.78
7.85
 
207
203
205
195
203
180
204
206
199
 
Hubner, Michael (1)
9.12
8.89
9.07
8.82
9.15
8.93
9.26
9.58
9.67
9.16
 
26
27
27
28
27
27
27
26
27
 
Ironson, David (5)
8.40
8.36
8.22
8.16
8.65
7.97
8.37
9.15
9.09
8.49
 
104
104
105
102
103
100
102
104
103
 
Maenza, Philip (8)
8.37
8.12
7.96
7.74
8.13
8.28
8.25
9.23
9.12
8.36
 
109
107
105
101
105
102
105
109
106
 
Manahan, Thomas* (2)
8.88
8.85
8.91
8.96
8.73
8.73
8.70
9.40
9.43
8.95
 
82
82
81
82
81
78
82
83
82
 
McGovern, William (20)
7.80
7.63
7.75
7.36
7.77
7.11
7.01
8.09
8.62
7.68
 
71
71
71
67
70
65
68
69
66
 
Minkowitz, Stuart (12)
8.11
8.05
8.12
8.17
8.16
7.53
7.61
8.70
9.01
8.16
 
83
82
82
78
82
79
82
82
82
 
Nergaard, Maryann (16)
7.97
7.78
7.68
7.25
8.12
7.76
7.85
8.53
9.04
8.00
 
71
69
68
63
69
66
71
73
70
 
Ramsay, Rosemary (17)
8.05
7.75
7.73
7.26
7.98
7.64
7.32
8.84
9.03
7.96
 
114
114
113
110
114
103
116
112
112
 
Rand, David* (19)
7.67
7.49
7.58
7.51
7.71
7.44
7.47
8.15
8.60
7.73
 
200
200
199
193
199
183
197
199
192
 
Weisenbeck, Thomas* (3)
8.66
8.66
8.57
8.68
8.95
8.42
8.63
9.19
9.11
8.77
 
149
150
150
145
147
137
147
150
146
 
Whipple, Mary (9)
8.12
8.19
7.97
8.02
8.26
7.93
7.93
9.00
8.97
8.26
 
58
59
58
58
58
57
59
59
59
 
Wilson, Deanne* (13)
7.98
7.92
8
7.84
8.12
7.72
7.52
8.8
8.94
8.09
 
273
271
271
263
269
257
269
270
262
 
Wright, Michael* (21)
7.52
7.21
6.76
6.56
7.11
7.09
7.01
8.64
8.82
7.41
 
105
104
105
101
107
97
105
108
101
 
AVERAGES
8.07
7.98
8.01
7.86
8.21
7.77
7.91
8.70
8.98
8.17

Welcome to ALM. You have read 0 out of 0 free articles this month

Get 2 months of unlimited access FREE

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202572361080

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.