SUPREME COURT McDougall v. Lamm TORTS — Emotional Distress New Jersey Law Journal August 2, 2012 | 0 Comments share share on linkedin Facebook share on twitter share on google+ Share With Email Send Thank you for sharing! Your article was successfully shared with the contacts you provided. reprints A pet owner is not permitted to recover for emotional distress caused by observing the traumatic death of her pet. This premium content is reserved for New Jersey Law Journal subscribers. Continue reading by getting started with a subscription. Subscribe Now for Unlimited Access Already a subscriber? Log in now VIEW COMMENTS ( 0 ) ADD COMMENT What's being said Sign In Terms & Conditions Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here. Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202565906574 Send Thank you! This article's comments will be reviewed.