U.S. SUPREME COURT

Talk America Inc. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.

COMMUNICATIONS — Rate Cases

New Jersey Law Journal

   | 0 Comments

The Federal Communications Commission's interpretation of its regulations — i.e., that an incumbent local exchange carrier, to satisfy its duty under Telecommunications Act § 251(c)(2), must make its existing entrance facilities available to competitors at cost-based rates if they are to be used for interconnection — is reasonable and entitled to judicial deference.

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202497362857

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.