Triffin v. Liccardi Ford Inc.

BANKING — Negotiable Instruments

New Jersey Law Journal


Because a check-cashing service made payment in violation of the Check Cashers Regulatory Act of 1993, the service was not a holder in due course and could not assign its interest in the check.

This premium content is reserved for New Jersey Law Journal subscribers.

Continue reading by getting started with a subscription.

Already a subscriber? Log in now

What's being said

Comments are not moderated. To report offensive comments, click here.

Preparing comment abuse report for Article #1202477869014

Thank you!

This article's comments will be reviewed.